The 'bivalent' nightmare begins - and there are already 549 reports in VAERS
And that's not including the URF...
Update: Comparative percentage increases from week 1 to week 2 of the COVID-19 shots (Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen) at the beginning of 2021 reveal a 54% increase in reports whereby, in the case of the ‘new’ “bivalent” Pfizer, Moderna products, there is a 437% increase in reports from September 17 to September 23, 2022.
So the new COVID-19 injectable products have been rolled out. Amendments to the EUAs (anyone thinking that we are in an emergency for any reason other than having psychopathic billionaires infesting and controlling science and medicine needs to do some reading), were issued to Moderna TX Inc. and Pfizer Inc and as a result, many people all around the world are lining up to get injected with this new product.
You can head here to read about the ‘safety’ testing that they did. I am not going to summarize it because quite frankly, I believe it would be a waste of my time at this point. The Wuhan strain is extinct in humans, and the Omicron BA.4 and 5 variants are soon to be.
Here’s what I wanted to focus on: the VAERS reports associated with these particular injections as first exposures.
There are 549 reports filed to VAERS as of September 17th, 2022 and of these, 74 (13.5%) are primary exposures (1st shots). This is astonishing as these new products were EUA ‘authorized’ only at the beginning of September: just 2 weeks passed until the first reports actually made it to the front-end of VAERS. Can you say, ‘safety signal’?
Of the 74 reports filed for first exposures, 10 (~13.5%) classified as severe, so far. Believe me, I am going to be keeping a close eye on this. But, to be clear, this really pisses me off. Most people who are being injected with this new ‘bivalent’ shot are doing so as a follow-up to previous shots! They are not only mixing products now but they are mixing types of injections! These things are NOT the same product as the previous ones (see saRNA article) and we, as data analysts, need the data to be remotely clean to determine whether or not the AEs being reported are due to the new products, or simply the by-product of damage already done by previous injections.
I just want to take a moment express how disgusted and appalled I am by the lack of structure and scientific integrity involved in everything associated with these COVID-19 injectable product roll-outs.
So let’s go deeper. I thought that the most pertinent information that I might be able to extract from this confounded data would be the reports filed for people who had this new bivalent product as a first shot. So of the 13.5% of the reports filed for these new products as first exposures to any COVID-19 injectable product, 6 filed myocarditis reports (8.1%).
One of these reports, one in particular caught my attention. VAERS ID #2443946 was made by a 24-year-old Californian girl, without previous medical issues - prior to this first injection with the new ‘bivalent’ products. This girl experienced heart trauma within 24 hours of injection and reports the following:
“I’ll just rest and see.” Hmm. I wonder what her outcome will be?
Another report with VAERS ID #2428859 was filed for a 20-year-old from Washington who received this new crap as a second shot and ended up in the hospital with pericarditis.
I could keep going, but the point I want to make is this: even with this very early data, it is very easy to see that the clear danger signals - just as clearly as before.
If you know someone on the fence about getting injected with this COVID nonsense, I would advise them to wait.
This plot shows the distribution of the new ‘bivalent’ shots by age. It is clear that people are getting these as first exposures at all ages. But, for the most part, people are getting these ‘bivalent’ exposures as 4rth and 5th shots and comprise primarily younger (25-50) and older ages (60-80), respectively.