So true. Those of us who by luck of resources (information, financial, anti-herd tendencies etc) avoided the mRNA transfections have in all likelihood gone on to question a whole lot more than covid....
Would be a stronger case to dig into history and timing, when major concerns for RSV surfaced as large numbers of people were being affected vs in prior years, when we never knew RSV even existed (May not have been let loose). Learning some “new diseases” were let loose by scientists messing around, oh sorry, experimenting with polio virus and with others. Are they now testing to approve a shot for those who already had their immune system decimated by Covid shots and boosters, calling this new disease RSV? Isn’t this approach potentially magnifying shot damage?? Just an odd thought; just say NO!
Why not just state the factual truth in an unambiguous way, free of dissembling and disingenuous construction.
Case in point, and I quote: "Safety and effectiveness in individuals 2 years through 17 years of age have not been established."
Instead, why not just say something like: "Determinative safety and effectiveness data do not exist at this time. No claims regarding the safety or effectiveness of this product are legitimate and as of this writing remain unknown. There are data demonstrating danger to human life arising from the use of this product."
A candid statement made in good faith by a fidcuary or officer of the process should at minimum transparently state the risk regarding what is known and what is not known. To do less should trigger unconscionable acts provisions long established in state consumer protection and other law. That principle is missing and thus truth-in-labeling suffers and individual citizens suffer because those with a duty to inform behave in unreasonable patterns of unconscionable behavior relative to existing statutes and case law controlling consumer information, deceptive acts and practices, unconscionable acts and products liability.
Perhaps they can exempt themselves from product liability. I do wonder if they can exempt themselves from unconscionable misrepresentations and the withholding of material fact to induce the sale of a product in the channels of trade. How can the principles, case law and black letter law of the UCC doctrine of Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose be denied an injured American citizen whose injury arose from a lie and/or other deceptive acts and unconscionable practices.
Pharma is not exempt from fraud; and if proven, may erase all other exemptions. Not easy when most clinical trial data is missing drop outs or has been redacted; Pharma has honed their presentation skills to FDA, not the ooops or the whoops or drop outs or why these people left the trial (which could obviate most reporting). No one seems to have cracked that nut...so far.
At some point the burden of proof flips and lands squarely on the collective heads of Big Health, Big Uni and Big Pharma.
The bad actors have lied about antiviral masking and about shutdown efficacy. They have lied about the pathologies and therapies in play. Everywhere you look, the bad actors have been wrong, and irreconcilably so.
Too often, when they knew or should have known they were wrong, billions in salaries and novel forms of payola, celebrity and career advancement were changing hands and changing chairs. How was this sophisticated orgy of self-dealing any different than a flash mob theft of a convenience store in San Francisco, Chicago or Los Angeles?
At some point in the pursuit of wrongdoing, the burden of proof flips. It will be up to them to explain why their alleged and rather incredible pattern of ignored, suppressed, meticulously corrupted and disingenuously presented data-driven "facts" are riven with conspicuous and apparently willful omissions and apparent manipulations.
Moreover, some will be formally confronted with the tragedies they caused by trafficking in hearsay. Such hearsay led to great suffering and death; hearsay that created hundreds of thousands of victims recklessly abused by fiat of arbitrary and capricious rent seeking on the part of the advocates devoted to this orgy of manipulation and exploitation of the most vulnerable human fear.
Obsessive and injurious precautionism is no virtue, especially when it becomes a device of self-enrichment. It matters little whether the enrichment is monetary or a means to feed the vanities of the ogre within. Too often, it's both.
To that, I think, they have little-to-no-defense, especially those who took the money and then willfully told the lies in pursuit of personal reward, even if the reward sought was the avoidance of institutional or corporate punishment.
It's rather difficult to see how those who should know better can participate in the monetization of fraud with impunity. The administrators and executives complicit should see the inside of a prison cell to set an essential example of the price of failed trusteeship.
Civilization needs nothing less to sufficiently begin to restore its civility, still the orgy of hubris and return to the principle of sanity over vanity.
Vanity would not let them say the most important thing: "We might be wrong."
If interested, Hedley Rees in the UK just posted on his Inside Pharma substack, an article w/ video link “Expert Notes on development, manufacture and distribution of sars-cov2 injections” - looks like good manufacturing processes were ignored.
who are these infants who participate in clinical trials? How can any parent think that this is a good idea?
I actually mean no harsh judgment. I'm sure the parents are brainwashed, lied to, very trusting. But still..... those poor children who cannot give informed consent.
Yes, I was injected as a child and subjected to various treatments, interventions, etc. by well-meaning parents who believed themselves to be doing the right thing. It has taken me years to reclaim my health, and first I had to learn that these childhood interventions were harmful to me. I believed in them, too, at the time. I continued to subject myself to medical interventions for another couple of decades before I got a clue.
To this day, my parents still believe in modern medicine and they have multiple, daily pills, a couple of doctor appointments each week (be sure to make an appointment on your way out!) and have taken the maximum allowable COVID shots. It is a wonder that they are still with us.
But they did tearfully beg and plead with me to get the jabs so that I would not die. And they did think that shunning unvaccinated people was probably wise. We don't talk about that. They get upset and their minds shut down. It's the saddest thing.
Oh my, I can relate because the pain is still so real that it stings.
The pain of being shunned at Christmas because my family made a conscious decision NOT to be jabbed has opened my eyes to true and pure ignorance. It is the kind of disappointment in "family" that kept us from my daughter's grandpa. His final Christmas will be one remembered differently than the others...
We hid our status like lepers, still do outside certain circles.
Thank-you Jessica. Your information is vital. Much appreciated ❤️ 🙏
I love my in laws. They're a stark contrast to my own parents (who were abusive in different ways). Like Dani above, I've been vaccine injured since childhood and react badly to almost all pharmaceutical drugs I have tried (my metabolism doesn't seem to work like the average person) and even some natural herbs. So needless to say the COVID jab was not an option for me (let alone my dubiousness of a medical treatment where clinical trials hadn't completed or the fact that it was a novel mRNA therapy). My inlaws of course were all in on the government propaganda. They were extremely nervous about us coming at Christmas (2021). Despite the fact that we did a RAT test beforehand (negative of course) and had zero symptoms, they still had this palpable undercurrent of fear. They'd also made it clear that no one was to talk about the jabs at Christmas (we hadn't planned to because Christmas?) as though they were expecting US to be the jerks about it. I would have hoped they would know me and their own child better than that.
Anyway, it was really hurtful. I have said nothing, because I don't want our relationship to be strained. But what rubs salt in the wound is that some months, maybe a year later, they got COVID while away on holiday (within our country but in a different part of it). They actually started getting symptoms before they left but assumed it was a cold or something (because being jabbed and brainwashed they thought they wouldn't get COVID). Did they cut their holiday short? Nope. They made a conscious choice to continue their holiday and even interacted with other holiday goers without informing them they were exposed. No masks. No care.
I doubt we will ever get an apology for the way they treated us. I'm not sure they are even aware that they treated us as though we were lepers or the hypocrisy of the actions. I still love my in laws, but the pain runs deep.
All that I have left in this world in the way of a "parental figure" since Valentines Day 2022 is my husband's step-mother. I do love and care for her deeply, but live with a hidden disappointment in her decision making skills. Outwardly, the only thing that has changed for me is that I do not see her as often anymore. It helps my sanity to steer clear of them all, which in turn hurts my husband. (Not the outcome I strive for!)
I miss my parents, they were both very solid, loving & encouraging parents. I miss my husband's father, he also became my Dad when mine passed and held that title for almost twenty years. When my mother-in-law takes her last breath, she will be missed just the same, mom.
Funny how your in-laws could be so deathly scared of you, yet share their retched illness with oodles of strangers. There are many hypocrites, all seem to be the jabbed. Truly mind-boggling times for the lot of us sane beings. Stay strong AlsoRose
My aunt, a highly respected cardiologist, called me an “idiot.” (I, the unvaxxed). I certainly did not wish myocarditis to happen, but young healthy people should be left alone — and kids, don’t get me started.
But you do have to get off your ass and turn off the tube and read.
We’ve known for well over 150+ years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.
And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.
And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.
If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.
People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.
And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.
And those “doctors” who are shilling for the medical cartel, the pharmafia and allopathic medicine should hang their heads in shame.
They know the truth, but have sold their soul to the company because their payment on their yacht, McMansion, and Jag is due.
Pitiful. Sickening, pathetic and pitiful.
And to those in the media, you drug pushing pieces of corporate shit: I hope you have a great answer come your judgment day.
Mullins' is a great book, one which opened my eyes 10 years ago, along with Peter Goetzsche, "Deadly Medicine and Organized Crime"....and many many others since then, including 'The Real Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr....wow evil cartel TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED because of this cartel.
Deadly medical practice and organized crime. Apparently that's a thing.
Con artists harvest life insurance policies by purchasing same for the insured with the insured's accidental death to follow. Why not harvest insurance in a similar fashion? Why not harvest government grants and program subsidies to a similar end?
Back in the 1990s, a senior medical scientist explained the American hospital, med school and health care administrative culture to me by candidly saying this about the typical administrator:
"You need to understand something. When you kill people for a living and routinely bury your mistakes, no lie becomes too big to tell."
Seem familiar compared to anything we've seen recently?
Thanks for sharing your experience. That is exactly what has happened, in hospitals, politics, even "organic farming" is one lie after another these days. (I do trust Organic Consumers Association but still check the citations). I hope you tune into VSRF with Steve Kirsch and Jessica Rose tonight at 7...or watch the replay. It'll be good.
It's a crisis in administrative culture and administrated institutions throughout the Western World. They can't manage so they administrate. The disingenuousness is normalized. The serial lying is normalized. The self-worshipping hubris is normalized. They see themselves as the victims, and they are, to some extent, entirely correct.
But we the public are not their victimizer. We are the betrayed.
In re the OCA. It's just another corporation controlled by insiders; a non-human alien person in the law with supposed human person standing but frequently special alien persons of super human standing. They are competing governments in competition against the human person. The institutions and economics they represent are mere artifacts of their governance authority, unelected though it may be, board of directors excepted.
Don’t forget - the “placebo” used is NEVER just saline! It ALWAYS contains toxic stuff so the drug doesn’t look as bad as it is. Often contains adjuvants, or is a different v@ccine, who knows what they have in there now.
Busy reading the book turtles all the way down... vaccine science and myth- in it states that the placebo especially with vaccine studies , is not an innert substance that won’t cause any reaction in the body such as saline solution, but a substance that can either be a predecessor vaccine of the current vaccine being tested, or it can be another type of vaccine for the same illness, or it can be the vaccine solution minus the vaccine specific ingredient. So The adverse results of the tested vaccine are compared against an innert / saline solution but to something that can and probably will cause some sort of reaction. So they compare rotten eggs, with rotten eggs so to speak.
Holy water use comes to mind.... buy then my mind wanders to the Catholic priests "blessing" that water.... Perhaps it's best to only say the drug name once.
Thanks for alerting us to this. I was surprised too to see so many deaths in the placebo group. I wonder if other researchers of other trials are noticing this mysterious phenomenon...
I wonder what drugs were given in the placebo?? I have read in many clinical trials another type of vaccine or drug (ie: measles alone vs MMR). They would inject measles in the placebo group vs the group receiving the MMR. Truly scewing results in their favor as it was not a true non drug placebo group. Just a thought regarding this trial, hence the reason so many died in the placebo group.
I couldn’t conclude that whatever causes “severe RSV” (it’s not due to a virus, since they don’t exist :) that it’s enough of a clinical problem to warrant going to the trouble of prophylaxis, presumably of the entire elderly population.
The number of deaths isn’t surprising given the 6 month follow up period, the number of subjects and their age (36% were 70-79). I recall being lectured by a clinician that if you study test drugs in large, elderly populations for prolonged periods, you will have deaths on study drug (& on placebo). Better hope you don’t get an imbalance against you, because there’s no way out, even if you think it’s bad luck & pure chance).
The non-trivial naming group must think these names up while at parties.
Even a sugar pill can harm certain people; however any substance that buries more of its recipients than those who receive an experimental drug is by definition not sufficiently inert to qualify as a placebo.
I think this mystery would be solved by identifying the contents of that "placebo". My understanding is that drug trials are increasingly using adulterated solutions (e.g. a known-harmful adjuvant or another vaccine rather than benign saline) while failing to disclose that. The researchers predictably observe increased harms in the control group, and that data helpfully deflates the relative risk of harm in the treatment group as compared to the sabotaged control group.
If the drug being studied sadly expires 10 of the treated subjects, and the known-harmful “placebo” reliably terminates 15 members of the similarly-sized control group, the collected and reported data indicates the treatment's a real lifesaver!
If someone can obtain a vial of official placebo from one or more clinical trials and analyze the contents, those findings could be very illuminating.
As the placebo is typically another vaccine and not sodium chloride, one wonders what the statistical difference would have been had an actual inert placebo been employed.
Unless the trial is a Hail Mary pass to save a child, I could never understand the need to potentially harm or sacrifice them in this interest of “science “.
sure there was no Vaxxed with C19 exclusion criteria.
Cuz - anybody who refused that jab sure as shit ain't gonna be a pincushion tester for this poison.
Sample size:
ZERO!
So true. Those of us who by luck of resources (information, financial, anti-herd tendencies etc) avoided the mRNA transfections have in all likelihood gone on to question a whole lot more than covid....
Would be a stronger case to dig into history and timing, when major concerns for RSV surfaced as large numbers of people were being affected vs in prior years, when we never knew RSV even existed (May not have been let loose). Learning some “new diseases” were let loose by scientists messing around, oh sorry, experimenting with polio virus and with others. Are they now testing to approve a shot for those who already had their immune system decimated by Covid shots and boosters, calling this new disease RSV? Isn’t this approach potentially magnifying shot damage?? Just an odd thought; just say NO!
Why not just state the factual truth in an unambiguous way, free of dissembling and disingenuous construction.
Case in point, and I quote: "Safety and effectiveness in individuals 2 years through 17 years of age have not been established."
Instead, why not just say something like: "Determinative safety and effectiveness data do not exist at this time. No claims regarding the safety or effectiveness of this product are legitimate and as of this writing remain unknown. There are data demonstrating danger to human life arising from the use of this product."
A candid statement made in good faith by a fidcuary or officer of the process should at minimum transparently state the risk regarding what is known and what is not known. To do less should trigger unconscionable acts provisions long established in state consumer protection and other law. That principle is missing and thus truth-in-labeling suffers and individual citizens suffer because those with a duty to inform behave in unreasonable patterns of unconscionable behavior relative to existing statutes and case law controlling consumer information, deceptive acts and practices, unconscionable acts and products liability.
Perhaps they can exempt themselves from product liability. I do wonder if they can exempt themselves from unconscionable misrepresentations and the withholding of material fact to induce the sale of a product in the channels of trade. How can the principles, case law and black letter law of the UCC doctrine of Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose be denied an injured American citizen whose injury arose from a lie and/or other deceptive acts and unconscionable practices.
Pharma is not exempt from fraud; and if proven, may erase all other exemptions. Not easy when most clinical trial data is missing drop outs or has been redacted; Pharma has honed their presentation skills to FDA, not the ooops or the whoops or drop outs or why these people left the trial (which could obviate most reporting). No one seems to have cracked that nut...so far.
At some point the burden of proof flips and lands squarely on the collective heads of Big Health, Big Uni and Big Pharma.
The bad actors have lied about antiviral masking and about shutdown efficacy. They have lied about the pathologies and therapies in play. Everywhere you look, the bad actors have been wrong, and irreconcilably so.
Too often, when they knew or should have known they were wrong, billions in salaries and novel forms of payola, celebrity and career advancement were changing hands and changing chairs. How was this sophisticated orgy of self-dealing any different than a flash mob theft of a convenience store in San Francisco, Chicago or Los Angeles?
At some point in the pursuit of wrongdoing, the burden of proof flips. It will be up to them to explain why their alleged and rather incredible pattern of ignored, suppressed, meticulously corrupted and disingenuously presented data-driven "facts" are riven with conspicuous and apparently willful omissions and apparent manipulations.
Moreover, some will be formally confronted with the tragedies they caused by trafficking in hearsay. Such hearsay led to great suffering and death; hearsay that created hundreds of thousands of victims recklessly abused by fiat of arbitrary and capricious rent seeking on the part of the advocates devoted to this orgy of manipulation and exploitation of the most vulnerable human fear.
Obsessive and injurious precautionism is no virtue, especially when it becomes a device of self-enrichment. It matters little whether the enrichment is monetary or a means to feed the vanities of the ogre within. Too often, it's both.
To that, I think, they have little-to-no-defense, especially those who took the money and then willfully told the lies in pursuit of personal reward, even if the reward sought was the avoidance of institutional or corporate punishment.
It's rather difficult to see how those who should know better can participate in the monetization of fraud with impunity. The administrators and executives complicit should see the inside of a prison cell to set an essential example of the price of failed trusteeship.
Civilization needs nothing less to sufficiently begin to restore its civility, still the orgy of hubris and return to the principle of sanity over vanity.
Vanity would not let them say the most important thing: "We might be wrong."
If interested, Hedley Rees in the UK just posted on his Inside Pharma substack, an article w/ video link “Expert Notes on development, manufacture and distribution of sars-cov2 injections” - looks like good manufacturing processes were ignored.
🎯
who are these infants who participate in clinical trials? How can any parent think that this is a good idea?
I actually mean no harsh judgment. I'm sure the parents are brainwashed, lied to, very trusting. But still..... those poor children who cannot give informed consent.
Yes, I was injected as a child and subjected to various treatments, interventions, etc. by well-meaning parents who believed themselves to be doing the right thing. It has taken me years to reclaim my health, and first I had to learn that these childhood interventions were harmful to me. I believed in them, too, at the time. I continued to subject myself to medical interventions for another couple of decades before I got a clue.
To this day, my parents still believe in modern medicine and they have multiple, daily pills, a couple of doctor appointments each week (be sure to make an appointment on your way out!) and have taken the maximum allowable COVID shots. It is a wonder that they are still with us.
But they did tearfully beg and plead with me to get the jabs so that I would not die. And they did think that shunning unvaccinated people was probably wise. We don't talk about that. They get upset and their minds shut down. It's the saddest thing.
Oh my, I can relate because the pain is still so real that it stings.
The pain of being shunned at Christmas because my family made a conscious decision NOT to be jabbed has opened my eyes to true and pure ignorance. It is the kind of disappointment in "family" that kept us from my daughter's grandpa. His final Christmas will be one remembered differently than the others...
We hid our status like lepers, still do outside certain circles.
Thank-you Jessica. Your information is vital. Much appreciated ❤️ 🙏
I love my in laws. They're a stark contrast to my own parents (who were abusive in different ways). Like Dani above, I've been vaccine injured since childhood and react badly to almost all pharmaceutical drugs I have tried (my metabolism doesn't seem to work like the average person) and even some natural herbs. So needless to say the COVID jab was not an option for me (let alone my dubiousness of a medical treatment where clinical trials hadn't completed or the fact that it was a novel mRNA therapy). My inlaws of course were all in on the government propaganda. They were extremely nervous about us coming at Christmas (2021). Despite the fact that we did a RAT test beforehand (negative of course) and had zero symptoms, they still had this palpable undercurrent of fear. They'd also made it clear that no one was to talk about the jabs at Christmas (we hadn't planned to because Christmas?) as though they were expecting US to be the jerks about it. I would have hoped they would know me and their own child better than that.
Anyway, it was really hurtful. I have said nothing, because I don't want our relationship to be strained. But what rubs salt in the wound is that some months, maybe a year later, they got COVID while away on holiday (within our country but in a different part of it). They actually started getting symptoms before they left but assumed it was a cold or something (because being jabbed and brainwashed they thought they wouldn't get COVID). Did they cut their holiday short? Nope. They made a conscious choice to continue their holiday and even interacted with other holiday goers without informing them they were exposed. No masks. No care.
I doubt we will ever get an apology for the way they treated us. I'm not sure they are even aware that they treated us as though we were lepers or the hypocrisy of the actions. I still love my in laws, but the pain runs deep.
Sorry, no disrespect but your in-laws require a mirror, front and center.
Hugs for your pain.
All that I have left in this world in the way of a "parental figure" since Valentines Day 2022 is my husband's step-mother. I do love and care for her deeply, but live with a hidden disappointment in her decision making skills. Outwardly, the only thing that has changed for me is that I do not see her as often anymore. It helps my sanity to steer clear of them all, which in turn hurts my husband. (Not the outcome I strive for!)
I miss my parents, they were both very solid, loving & encouraging parents. I miss my husband's father, he also became my Dad when mine passed and held that title for almost twenty years. When my mother-in-law takes her last breath, she will be missed just the same, mom.
Funny how your in-laws could be so deathly scared of you, yet share their retched illness with oodles of strangers. There are many hypocrites, all seem to be the jabbed. Truly mind-boggling times for the lot of us sane beings. Stay strong AlsoRose
My aunt, a highly respected cardiologist, called me an “idiot.” (I, the unvaxxed). I certainly did not wish myocarditis to happen, but young healthy people should be left alone — and kids, don’t get me started.
It is sad that our own family can be pitted against us for making more prudent decisions regarding our health care.
Many families were absolutely destroyed. The power of mass psychosis is terrifying.
I’ve said this so many times already and I’ll say it again...and again:
When will people do historical research and find out that anytime you inject anything into your body, you’re on a highway to hell.
NEVER in the history of mankind has injecting poisons into your body given you better health.
Quite the opposite. They’ve ALL maimed and killed. Read and learn the history of this barbaric act:
The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations https://a.co/d/cfvx9Q6
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/coVuit4
- George William Winterburn, PhD, MD, The Value of Vaccination: A Non-partisan Review of Its History and Results, 1886
- History and Pathology of Vaccination, Edgar R. Crookshank, 1889
- Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination. A Strange Chapter of Medical History, 1889
https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds
There are many others, they’re just a few.
Finding the truth isn’t that hard
But you do have to get off your ass and turn off the tube and read.
We’ve known for well over 150+ years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.
And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.
And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.
If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.
People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.
And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.
And those “doctors” who are shilling for the medical cartel, the pharmafia and allopathic medicine should hang their heads in shame.
They know the truth, but have sold their soul to the company because their payment on their yacht, McMansion, and Jag is due.
Pitiful. Sickening, pathetic and pitiful.
And to those in the media, you drug pushing pieces of corporate shit: I hope you have a great answer come your judgment day.
Eustace Mullins Murder By Injection; The Story Of The Medical Conspiracy Against America
(1988)
https://archive.org/details/EustaceMullinsMurderByInjectionTheStoryOfTheMedicalConspiracyAgainstAmerica1988
Mullins' is a great book, one which opened my eyes 10 years ago, along with Peter Goetzsche, "Deadly Medicine and Organized Crime"....and many many others since then, including 'The Real Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr....wow evil cartel TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED because of this cartel.
Deadly medical practice and organized crime. Apparently that's a thing.
Con artists harvest life insurance policies by purchasing same for the insured with the insured's accidental death to follow. Why not harvest insurance in a similar fashion? Why not harvest government grants and program subsidies to a similar end?
Back in the 1990s, a senior medical scientist explained the American hospital, med school and health care administrative culture to me by candidly saying this about the typical administrator:
"You need to understand something. When you kill people for a living and routinely bury your mistakes, no lie becomes too big to tell."
Seem familiar compared to anything we've seen recently?
Thanks for sharing your experience. That is exactly what has happened, in hospitals, politics, even "organic farming" is one lie after another these days. (I do trust Organic Consumers Association but still check the citations). I hope you tune into VSRF with Steve Kirsch and Jessica Rose tonight at 7...or watch the replay. It'll be good.
It's a crisis in administrative culture and administrated institutions throughout the Western World. They can't manage so they administrate. The disingenuousness is normalized. The serial lying is normalized. The self-worshipping hubris is normalized. They see themselves as the victims, and they are, to some extent, entirely correct.
But we the public are not their victimizer. We are the betrayed.
Exactly as you described, we have been betrayed.
Why be the law-abiding fools any longer?
In re the OCA. It's just another corporation controlled by insiders; a non-human alien person in the law with supposed human person standing but frequently special alien persons of super human standing. They are competing governments in competition against the human person. The institutions and economics they represent are mere artifacts of their governance authority, unelected though it may be, board of directors excepted.
Yep, you right. Its the same evil Babylonian cult that has been around for thousands of years too.
Thanks to all in this post.
Understanding the enemy prolongs health.
Music man: how many of “us” do you think are out there? I mean, do we have any scientific polls done! Are we in the minority? Surely not?
The Mahatma said the same thing about vaccines.
Don’t forget - the “placebo” used is NEVER just saline! It ALWAYS contains toxic stuff so the drug doesn’t look as bad as it is. Often contains adjuvants, or is a different v@ccine, who knows what they have in there now.
Not only are the animal studies before human, sometimes they’re even done instead of them, with as many as 8 mice…
8 mice. How can anyone question or doubt?
Three blind mice.
Three blind mice.
See how they run.
They all ran after the farmer's wife,
Who cut off their tails with a carving knife.
Did you ever see such a sight in your life
As three blind mice?
This rhyme has historical significance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Blind_Mice
They likely started with 3,000 mice... We only hear about the 8 that didn't catch fire.
Busy reading the book turtles all the way down... vaccine science and myth- in it states that the placebo especially with vaccine studies , is not an innert substance that won’t cause any reaction in the body such as saline solution, but a substance that can either be a predecessor vaccine of the current vaccine being tested, or it can be another type of vaccine for the same illness, or it can be the vaccine solution minus the vaccine specific ingredient. So The adverse results of the tested vaccine are compared against an innert / saline solution but to something that can and probably will cause some sort of reaction. So they compare rotten eggs, with rotten eggs so to speak.
"Arexvy," because "aresvy" would be too on the nose. I wonder if one of the side effects will be RSV infection?
Of course it will be! 😂 Vaccine-resistant super infection, of course!
And they will blame that on the unjected.
I'm afraid to try to say the names of many of the newer drugs out loud. I'm afraid I might inadvertently call up a demon.
Holy water use comes to mind.... buy then my mind wanders to the Catholic priests "blessing" that water.... Perhaps it's best to only say the drug name once.
😆
Thanks for alerting us to this. I was surprised too to see so many deaths in the placebo group. I wonder if other researchers of other trials are noticing this mysterious phenomenon...
I wonder what drugs were given in the placebo?? I have read in many clinical trials another type of vaccine or drug (ie: measles alone vs MMR). They would inject measles in the placebo group vs the group receiving the MMR. Truly scewing results in their favor as it was not a true non drug placebo group. Just a thought regarding this trial, hence the reason so many died in the placebo group.
I recall reading that their aim is to get RSV on the babies’ list of mandatory vax. With multiple doses. So thanks for watching this!!
I couldn’t conclude that whatever causes “severe RSV” (it’s not due to a virus, since they don’t exist :) that it’s enough of a clinical problem to warrant going to the trouble of prophylaxis, presumably of the entire elderly population.
The number of deaths isn’t surprising given the 6 month follow up period, the number of subjects and their age (36% were 70-79). I recall being lectured by a clinician that if you study test drugs in large, elderly populations for prolonged periods, you will have deaths on study drug (& on placebo). Better hope you don’t get an imbalance against you, because there’s no way out, even if you think it’s bad luck & pure chance).
The non-trivial naming group must think these names up while at parties.
I actually would love to be paid to come up with drug names. I think it would be a riot.
You’d likely be very good at it :)
Haha!
Superb as always Jessica.
Even a sugar pill can harm certain people; however any substance that buries more of its recipients than those who receive an experimental drug is by definition not sufficiently inert to qualify as a placebo.
I think this mystery would be solved by identifying the contents of that "placebo". My understanding is that drug trials are increasingly using adulterated solutions (e.g. a known-harmful adjuvant or another vaccine rather than benign saline) while failing to disclose that. The researchers predictably observe increased harms in the control group, and that data helpfully deflates the relative risk of harm in the treatment group as compared to the sabotaged control group.
If the drug being studied sadly expires 10 of the treated subjects, and the known-harmful “placebo” reliably terminates 15 members of the similarly-sized control group, the collected and reported data indicates the treatment's a real lifesaver!
If someone can obtain a vial of official placebo from one or more clinical trials and analyze the contents, those findings could be very illuminating.
As the placebo is typically another vaccine and not sodium chloride, one wonders what the statistical difference would have been had an actual inert placebo been employed.
Maybe I missed it, but what was the "placebo"? Knowing that will explain a lot.
Keep in mind a “placebo” may not always be saline, but another vaccine instead, like a meningitis vaccine.
Here is an interesting article relating to that:
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-health/placebos-used-vaccine-trials-do-not-please-everyone
Unless the trial is a Hail Mary pass to save a child, I could never understand the need to potentially harm or sacrifice them in this interest of “science “.