Discover more from Unconditional Jessica
Rejecting monopoly everything...
What you need to know...
Tess Lawrie and the tireless crew at the World Council for Health (WCH) have penned a document entitled: “Rejecting monopoly power over global public health - on the proposed IHR (2005) amendments and WHO pandemic treaty”. It’s a 45-page document outlining the proposed new ‘amendments’ of the WHO as they claim the right to authority over all sovereign nations and beings.
The World Council for Health officially puts British MPs on notice that it is not acceptable to transfer any decision-making powers reserved for democratic institutions to an unelected, unaccountable supranational body like the WHO.
Next week, your MPs will receive
1- a full 45-page policy brief document called Rejecting Monopoly Power over Global Public Health prepared by political and legal experts, [in final revision]
2- a 7-page summary of the policy brief,
3- a cover letter highlighting the issues with the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and/or the WHO Pandemic Accord concerning sovereignty, censorship, surveillance, gain-of-function research, and more,
4- a copy of the WHO’s Article-by-Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments to the IHR. MPs can no longer say they did not know. This effort is crowd funded. It is democracy in action. We thank @ABridgen for his tremendous support. You can read the summary of the expert policy brief yourself here:
Just so you know, the proposed amendment (WHO 2023a:3) of Article 3 Principles, strikes out ‘full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons’ and replaces it with a banality referring to equity and inclusivity, which is basically just bla bla - word salad to make it sound like people will actually have rights. THEY WON’T.
They removed the words ‘persons (humans)’, ‘respect’, ‘dignity’, ‘human rights’ and ‘fundamental freedoms’ and replaced them with ‘equity’, ‘inclusivity’, ‘coherence’ (code word for compliance), ‘in accordance with responsibilities of the State Parties’.
DOES THAT SOUND OK TO YOU? It’s INSANE. They are banking on the people not learning about these ‘amendments’ and/or not understanding what they mean.