30 Comments

Sen. Ron Johnson's senate hearing on the covid clot shots just started on CHD. Ryan Cole and Peter McCullough are there.

Expand full comment
author

yes i know. i was meant to be there :)

Expand full comment

I wish you and Dr. Hodkinson and Mike Yeadon and Dr. Seneff had been there.

Expand full comment

Ed Dowd, Robert Malone, and Dr. Theresa Long are there too. Looks like the jabs are killing 600,000 Americans each year which will make Bill happy.

Expand full comment

That's not nearly enoough for him

Expand full comment

It might not be well known, but before the first dose was given, President Trump signed into law a bill giving complete and absolute immunity from liability for any negligent or reckless damages resulting from the vaccines, for all makers and providers. All liability rests on the recipients:

“Courts have characterized PREP Act immunity as “sweeping.” It applies to all types of legal claims under state and federal law. For example, under state tort law, individuals who suffer injuries caused by the intentional or negligent acts or omissions of another person may generally sue that person to recover monetary compensation. Thus, in the health care context, if a health care provider negligently administers a drug or device that causes a foreseeable injury to a patient, the injured person may be able to sue the provider for compensation under state tort law.

Federal laws such as the PREP Act may preempt state tort laws—as well as other state and federal laws— in certain contexts. Preemptive federal legislation displaces state law to alter the usual liability rules or immunize certain individuals from liability. In the PREP Act, Congress made the judgment that, in the context of a public health emergency, immunizing certain persons and entities from liability was necessary to ensure that potentially life-saving countermeasures will be efficiently developed, deployed, and administered.

...

If within the scope of the declaration, the PREP Act immunizes a covered person from legal liability for all claims for loss relating to the administration or use of a covered countermeasure. The requirements for PREP Act immunity thus break down into four elements: (1) the individual or entity must be a “covered person”; (2) the legal claim must be for a “loss”; (3) the loss must have a “causal relationship” with the administration or use of a covered countermeasure; and (4) the medical product that caused the loss must be a “covered countermeasure.”

First, the PREP Act defines a covered person to include (i) the United States; (ii) manufacturers and distributors of covered countermeasures; (iii) “program planners”; and (iv) “qualified persons” who prescribe, administer, or dispense covered countermeasures. Program planners include Indian Tribes, state governments, and local governments who supervise programs that dispense, distribute, or administer covered countermeasures, or provide policy guidance, facilities, and scientific advice on the administration or use of such countermeasures. Qualified persons include licensed health professionals and other individuals authorized to prescribe, administer, or dispense covered countermeasures under state law, as well as other categories of persons identified by the Secretary in a PREP Act declaration. Employees and agents of all these persons and entities are also covered persons.

Second, PREP Act immunity reaches “all claims for loss” under federal and state law. Loss is broadly defined to mean “any type of loss,” including (i) death; (ii) physical, mental, or emotional injury, illness, disability, or condition; (iii) fear of such injury, including medical monitoring costs; and (iv) loss of or damage to property, including business interruption loss. This language seemingly includes, at a minimum, most state law tort, medical malpractice, and wrongful death claims arising from the administration of covered countermeasures.

Third, the loss must have a causal relationship to the administration and use of a covered countermeasure. As with the other elements, the PREP Act’s causation language sweeps relatively broadly. PREP Act immunity applies to any claim for loss that has “a causal relationship with the design, development, clinical testing or investigation, manufacture, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging, marketing,promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, or use” of a covered countermeasure.

Fourth, the medical product at issue must be a covered countermeasure. The PREP Act specifies four types of covered countermeasures: (i) a qualified “pandemic or epidemic product”; (ii) a “security countermeasure”; (iii) a drug, biological product, or device that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized for emergency use; and (iv) a “respiratory protective device” that is approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

A pandemic or epidemic product includes any drug, biological product, or device developed “to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic” or used “to limit the harm such pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause.” In addition, drugs, biological products, or devices used to treat the side effects of a pandemic or epidemic product, or to enhance their effects, may themselves be covered countermeasures. In either case, to be a covered countermeasure, the pandemic or epidemic product must be approved, licensed, or authorized for emergency use by FDA.

The emergency use category of covered countermeasures includes drugs, biological products, and devices that FDA has authorized for use outside its ordinary regulatory processes via an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). FDA has made wide use of its emergency authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, issuing EUAs for certain in vitro diagnostic products (i.e., tests for COVID-19), antibody tests, personal protective equipment (e.g., respirators and face shields), ventilators, therapeutic drugs, and vaccines.” https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10443

Expand full comment

Yep, Trump is another spoke on the wheel, but milliions are snowed by him, just like Musk.

Expand full comment

Brandon forced people to take the bioweapon or be fired. Trump never forced anyone to take it.

Expand full comment

Obviously, they were both part of the same ongoing plan.

Expand full comment
Dec 8, 2022·edited Dec 8, 2022

Well. Either Trump is a spoke on the wheel or his ego is so big and his emotional IQ so small he's a detriment. He's not helping either. Let's not pick Trump because we're comparing him to that half witted geriatric pedophile. There is a chance they're all FOS.

Expand full comment

PS

Also, it might not be well known, but before the first dose was given, President Trump signed into law a bill giving complete and absolute immunity from liability for any negligent or reckless damages resulting from the vaccines, for all makers and providers. All liability rests on the recipients:

Expand full comment

As long as there was no fraud committed on the part of the provider.

Expand full comment

"The “sole exception” to immunity is when a covered person proximately causes death or serious physical injury to another person through willful misconduct. A serious physical injury must be life threatening, permanently impair a body function, permanently damage a body structure, or require medical intervention to avoid such permanent impairment or damage. Willful misconduct requires that the covered person acted (i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose; (ii) knowingly without legal or factual

justification; and (iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable that the harm will outweigh the benefit." https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10443

"Proximately" means that the misconduct must be close in time to the injury - causality is the rule, not just correlation.

Expand full comment

Satans minon, Musk, who acts like he's your friend but is anyithing BUT will not unblock the most cited doctor in the world. Peter McCullough, M.D.

If ANY OF YOU think Elon is good, think again. The father of Transhumanism.

Expand full comment

Here's another thing. Allegedlly China is easing all COVID restrictions? WHY??? Because the people are pushing back in a meanful way. UNTIL WE PUSH BACK IN A MEANINGFUL way, not a GD thing will change. and if it does, it won't change for long. And again people are too snowed. ALl of a sudden people love Elon, MY GOSH, people are gullible and easy to fool

Expand full comment

Thanks - what a heartbreaking interview. I can also recommend this hard-to-watch interview with Adam Rowland, in the UK Column's series, 'Vaccine Damage - Real People'.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/vaccine-damage-real-people-adam

Another life ruined, this time in England, but with the same issues of being told they're suffering from 'anxiety' etc.

Grateful to you and all your colleagues in the fight, Dr R.

Expand full comment

I have to ask - did all these people that supposedly got covid starting in Jan 2020 ever get flu shots fall of 2019? And/or is it MIND OVER MATTER and needing to feel they are part of the herd and so develop imaginary symptoms?

Expand full comment

This is heartbreaking. Unsafe and ineffective.

Expand full comment

this is fng unbelievable !!!!!!

Expand full comment

So sad for injured & family who lost loved ones to this poisonous shot.

How many have to come forward or die before our corrupt governments take action???

Expand full comment

It's exactly because the government is corrupt that it will never take action.

Everyone must understand that the government is complicit in the carnage. They are taking their orders from the globalist parasites who want to ultimately enslave humanity through vax "passports" and CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency).

Expand full comment

The corrupt governments are totally shielded from any sort of liability, by federal law, as are all makers and providers, see my comment at https://jessica5b3.substack.com/p/please-watch-and-share-this-interview/comment/10984952

Expand full comment

I noticed that a lot of those with adverse reactions have been considered to be suffering from anxiety and depression notwithstanding the physical forensic evidence of damage, this is interesting in itself

since a lot of people were coerced into taking the jabs in the knowledge that they might perhaps

come to grief, and this in itself would have been bound to have induced a degree of anxiety pre-"vaccine" in the recipient, afterwards when the adverse reactions became physical of course the anxiety could only naturally increase.But the range of adverse physical conditions experienced are so numerous and diverse and almost impossible to characterize though, so I think we should really be seriously asking what exactly is in all of the vaccines that is causing all the harms? Protecting the formulations by intellectual property/patent rights under these circumstances is really a crime in itself.

Expand full comment

It is so difficult to know that people are suffering like this, but we cant help them if we don't know. Thank you for sharing this. Now we can join React19 to try and help.

Expand full comment

Everyone on this list has the power to grab this link and post it to everyone of their social media channels. DO SOMETHING NOW!

Expand full comment

I shared this numerous places & hope it goes viral!

Expand full comment

I saw your video on the c 💉 reaction stats on vaers. I wanted to add that there could potentially be alot of people who wrote to vaers but maybe did not have thier information put on. I sent my details to vaers but when I checked it wasn't on thier system. When I asked they said there had being a glitch. I then resubmitted and the 2nd attempt went on. It made me wonder how many people / drs submitted the forms but didn't check if the info actually made it onto the website.

Expand full comment

Thanks, its in the que.

Expand full comment