Ma-ma-ma mind controlla

Some scribblings...

I was invited to speak as part The Canadian Patriot lecture series yesterday with Matthew Ehret and friends. Following a few words here and there about Brussels (that involved telling members of the European Parliament about millions of people being injured by the COVID shots with data), IHR amendments (proposed by mega-private enterprises [aka: ‘specialized agencies’] funded primarily by ghates that aim to end humanity as we know it under the guise of saving it from itself), and DNA contamination (recently discovered by Kevin McKernan in the COVID shots given to billions of people that likely means those people are continuously expressing spike protein and/or its derivatives) from me, there was a question and answer period from the friends. The questions ranged in subject matter from 5G’s role in plans relating to the future of humans, to injecting our animal friends with mRNA tech and the potential repercussions. It was a good time.

Matthew soon thereafter sent me link to a previous article he’d written up entitled: “What do UFOs, Laurence Rockefeller and MK Ultra Have in Common? More than you think” and a related Substack article he wrote. It got me thinking about a whole lot of things, and then reading about a whole lot of things. As part of the reference list in this article, I found a piece entitled: “Tavistock mass murderers are brainwashing your children”, published in 1993 by Scott Thompson and Jeffrey Steinberg in Executive Intelligence Review. Some interesting reading there.

I had only once heard about Tavistock in passing - actually from an Irish woman trying to have an intelligent conversation with an angry bird on the streets of Dublin whilst Billboard Chris filmed. You should watch it. When confronted with a very simple and rational question (she was asked what ‘trans’ means), the angry bird walked off in a huff. Despite being angry, aggressive and wrong in her accusations, she was clearly quite intelligent, so, in honor of eternal optimism, perhaps one day she’ll turn her anger into something constructive and fight for children instead of an ideology that she didn’t incept.

Here’s a quote from the Thompson/Steinberg article:

Key to these reforms is the concept that teachers are no longer responsible for imparting knowledge and truth. Instead, their function has been changed to something akin to a therapist: They make a psychological intervention into the minds of children, shaping their personality, values, and attitudes. In the current jargon they are called "facilitators" or "change agents," but they are more properly called therapists.

The reforms referred to here are educational reforms that involve cleansing bad think, and injecting good think, from and to children, with the ultimate goal of all-inclusive group think. It’s tied into this notion of Group Dynamics termed by Kurt Lewin.

Does this sound familiar to you? It does to me. But what is this Tavistock? (Their website is quite, front-y-looking. Not much, meat. Lots of ‘art’ and golf imagery.)

Tavistock a private, not-for-profit organization that claims a sort of benevolence, but has its roots in the military, psychiatry, mind control, manipulation, psychedelics and other ‘pharmaceuticals’. The Rockefeller Foundation aided their inception and execution, and there are plenty of ties to lovely fellows, such as Dr. Ewen Cameron. This is all well documented. Just so that you know, Cameron thought mental illness was contagious and needed to be stomped out of the humans completely. He’s also the MK Ultra guy. I guess you could say he wanted to curare people? Shocking. Dark humor is better than no humor?

He said:

Get it understood how dangerous these damaged, sick personalities are to ourselves – and above all, to our children, whose traits are taking form and we shall find ways to put an end to them. Experts must develop methods of forcefully changing attitudes and beliefs to prevent the authoritarian overlord.¹

Prevent the authoritarian overlord? Wait now. Doesn’t someone experimenting on other human beings with experimental pharmaceuticals and shock therapy kind of qualify as a self-appointed authoritarian overlord? Yes, perhaps you’re right Dr. Camera mon. Perhaps we should forcefully change attitudes to prevent the authoritarian overlord.

I am leaving it up to you to do a lot of background reading folks, but safe to say, people who desire to control the minds of others are nothing if not, ever-present. These same individuals, dare I say, are at the heart of most, if not all, of the psycho-social disorders that we are all a part of nowadays. It’s almost as if they’ve created the circumstances for the inevitable emergence of non-creative minds - readily controllable: ready to mold. But hey, like I said before, “Some Jedi are just that strong”, meaning that there are just some people who appear to be immune to brainwashing. But the capability to resist it is in all of us.

Here’s a question worth pondering. What if the mind control techniques that began as horrific experimentation during those shocking times (pardon the pun again) are still being employed? What if they are being employed/deployed in schools of young minds? What if the ‘therapists’ and ‘facilitators’ currently exist in our schools? What if the school curriculum shifts from challenging and rigorous exercises in reading, writing and arithmetic to something more ‘inclusive’ like ensuring children are absolutely confused about even whether or not they carry sperm or eggs or whether or not they are twerking ‘well enough’ for adults?

Something I found quite thought-provoking in my reading on the subject matter of psychedelics and hallucinogenic ‘pharmaceuticals’, was the idea that the entire drug culture (LSD, psychedelics, etc) is also a big, fat, lie. Bands included. Imagine that everything you’ve ever heard - in the context of psychedelics - about the benefits of micro-dosing was just another pile of horse shit? What if the drug thang is just a derivative of the original experiment? What if the infusion of legal pharmaceuticals into the humans is a spin-off/continuation of the experiments done prior?

It’s mind-blowing to start thinking about this as a possibility once the idea is put into place. And when you start, you kind of can’t stop. Websites and blogs that explore subject matter that is new to me prompt me to ask myself new questions. Questions like: Why did they write this if it is not true? What motivates a person to believe something in the first place? David Icke is beautiful example of someone who makes me ask these questions. He has so many interesting and detailed explanations and stories about just about everything you can think of. I have gone from the typical “he’s off his rocker” type thinking about him, to “well, he got that one right!” Now I am left wondering (in addition to: “where the hell does he come up with this stuff”) “what if he’s right about that too?”

He’s a very intelligent person and clearly not mentally unstable. I would not say he is delusional either. He doesn’t seem so interested in fame and also seems to handle it beautifully. Many do not. He’s engaging, and polite and appears to truly enjoy talking to people about what he feels to be true. In truth, to me, he seems a rather lovely fellow and I would love to have a cup of tea with him. I feel somehow, that after speaking with him for an hour or two, that I would leave with far more questions than answers. Which is always good. Questioning means a mind is open. Does that leave it more susceptible to being controlled? I think this truly depends on the individual.

Another thing that Matthew speaks on quite prolifically here, is the idea that this same concept can also be applied to the ‘alien story’. Maybe the whole alien story and UFOs has more easily been propagated with the help of hallucinogens? Who knows. It sure seems like it might be possible that humans have been developing awesome spacecraft for a long time now, without having absconded the technology from aliens that crash landed here. I have made no decisions about what to believe on this subject matter either.

What I know this that destroying creative individuals and replacing them with docile, mind-controlled automatons seems evil to me. Not bad: evil. And arrogant. And stupid. And counter-productive.

Matthew suggests that perhaps it is not the human being - with our amazing creativities - that need to be reeled-in and culled to save the planet. Perhaps it is the evil lurking in the shadows that needs to be culled. Nature has a way of balancing herself and if you ask me, she will always have the last word when it comes to us, no matter how destructive the war-mongers among us are.

Maybe the whole ecosystem would be greener and happier if we did [not shut] down industrial civilization in order to defend nature from human creative thought.

Mind control is a tricky thing. How do we even know if our minds are being controlled? Can we know? Is there a little voice in our heads, or an instinctive feeling that alerts us to lurking predators who would rob us of control of our thoughts and minds? Of our sanities? Of our individualities?

My take on hard questions like these is, don’t try to answer them; just perpetually ask them. This is one way I feel somewhat assured that I am not under heavy mind-control: if I can still question that I am, then I likely am not.

I want to acknowledge a difficulty that can arise when you start doubting too many things - maybe even every thing or body. This is something I think that many people I personally know can relate to now in these maddening convid times - who can we trust? Can we even trust raw data anymore? I will try to put into words what came to me on my walk today which ties really well into these questions. A clear message came to me that went something like this: never stop having faith in people and never stop trust initiation - something akin to innocent until proven guilty.

An extension of a hand of trust might be rewarded with trust given in return. This is foundation of friendships and bonding. Without trust, or the suspension of mistrust, we cannot establish true connection to others. I think this might be at the heart of the success of the mind control techniques imposed by nefarious types: to create isolation, wipe self-identity and creativity, and to remove trust bonds. One must dehumanize the individual, and a massive part of dehumanization is removing the actual human - the being that can trust, love, have faith, have hope and laugh. For no bloody reason at all, except for the fact that we can.

Trust is also a tricky thing. To be betrayed, even once, by someone in whom you’ve placed trust in, is something that some people can never recover from. But maybe think of it this way: in this case, the mind controllers have won again. To create walls around you, well, puts walls between you and potential new friendships and bonds. I am not promoting naïveté - not at all - just, trusting, with eyes open. Whatever eyes are.

It’s almost like you have to have the most truth and faith in yourself.

The best course of action (based on my own experiences) is to try not to become hard and cold in response to betrayal, but to try to develop successively better coping mechanisms. Most of the time, this involves the ability to forgive. This is a hard one, I know. Especially in reference to forgiving oneself. But in any worthy fight, perhaps expecting hardship might make it easier to cope with it when it comes. It is a part of life. And life is a miracle. Forgiveness, I am learning, comes from a very deep place within yourself.

It really does seem like we are fighting for our lives right now, doesn’t it? Maybe we always have been. I think a good approach to fighting the monster of mind controllers is to accept they’re all around us and that it’s possible we are being controlled right now. Then, go on a journey of discovery with as many questions as you can ask. There’s an episode of Star Trek Voyager called ‘The thaw’ where Janeway fights ‘Fear’ and defeats it by asking whether or not there is more to fear than just a simple demand to exist. She remarks then, that fear’s only reason for existence is to be overcome. Fear then vanishes.²

Mind control. Control of mind. Learning to trust fear. And when to conquer it. While maintaining cautiousness.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron

2. https://www.jammersreviews.com/st-voy/s2/thaw.php