Oct 1, 2022·edited Oct 1, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose
Answer 1 -- yes, it was very likely man made.
Answer 2 -- this paper and many others were hidden because fauch, gates and China want everything censored.
Making contagious viruses is a bad thing, but this one wasn't very good. It harmed the unhealthy and those with corrupt or stupid doctors. Competent immune systems handle it well. Competent doctors handle it well after a short learning curve. The greatest damage was done by the medical industry and the political and media sycophants who support them.
I would only take issue with your comment that healthy people “handle it” well.
If what this paper says is true, then the (artificial) spike protein can incorporate into the host DNA. I don’t think this is necessarily only for the vaccine S protein. If the S protein for the original strain that “escaped” from Wuhan (which was engineered in Canada?!?) has these same inserts, then it might be that natural infection may help incorporate artificial S protein into our DNA. Of course, this happens in nature all the time. But in this case, WHY would they design it like that? What other RNA segments are hidden in the Wuhan strain that are designed for nefarious reasons?
As an aside. I remember early on in the pandemic, way before the vaccine came out, that there was a suspicion that the Chinese stole some biological material or data from a CANADIAN high level bio lab. Does anyone remember that story?
We were discussing the virus, not the vax. I haven't seen anything conclusive, but the damage seems to be dose dependent. Virus infection in healthy people is cleared quickly, quicker in some than in others. Relatively few spikes, and those aren't cleaved from the cells, but are eliminated by the immune system. The vax seems to hide better than the virus, and keeps producing spikes much longer, allowing them to accumulate in tissues with toxic effects. We've only begun to identify the long term effects of the vax or the virus. Vax analysis is forbidden, so that will take longer.
Yes, I recall reading about Baric In NC being prohibited in the US for that type of research. So it went to Canada where it was stolen by Chinese spies. Since Gain of Function was in China, wonder the relationship with the theft?
You are not right, David at the state "Competent immune system handle it well." Competent doctors - please make a clarification since then all the MDs in this country passed re-examination on Covid-19.
People liking this comment, because it is a new form of "believes" formed on the opposite side of social division. Reality is worse and much complex.
Most people were infected, and most of them were unaffected or mildly affected. Their immune systems worked as advertised. A very few got seriously ill. Their immune systems didn't work well. That has been proven by numerous surveys showing a lot more people with antibodies than were reported as infected. Our immune systems have kept us healthy for thousands of years. It's only recently we've purposely defeated it with poor diet and hedonism.
Doctors knew with near absolute certainty in early 2020 that cheap, effective therapies were easily available, but most doctors refused to prescribe them and most pharmacies refused to sell them. That caused one of the greatest mass murders in history. The new form of faith is believing what fauch, or medical bureaucrats, or even clinicians tell us. Successful people learn to supervise their medical employees, not worship them.
Immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike protein and nucleocapsid) revealed that the lesions with necrotizing encephalitis as well as the acute inflammatory changes in the small blood vessels (brain and heart) were associated with abundant de- posits of the spike protein SARS-CoV-2 subunit 1. Since the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 was consistently absent, it must be assumed that the presence of spike pro- tein in affected tissues was not due to an infection with SARS-CoV-2 but rather to the transfection of the tissues by the gene-based COVID-19-vaccines. Importantly, spike protein could be only demonstrated in the areas with acute inflammatory reactions (brain, heart, and small blood vessels), in particular in endothelial cells, microglia, and astrocytes. This is strongly suggestive that the spike protein may have played at least a contributing role to the development of the lesions and the course of the disease in this patient.
This is a great write-up Jess. Love your PyMols too!
Here's another piece of the puzzle by the way...
If you were going to create a bioweapon and discovered that is was actually piss-poor what you would need to do is make sure that it had GP120 peptides in available locations that were known to be required for antibody-dependent enhancement and which were tolerant of lab manipulation so that they could be inserted into your bioweapon. If your bioweapon flopped then all you would need to do is get your whole population injected with a therapy that produces buckets of antibodies to those peptides so that you could increase infectivity.
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
oh dear. this is exactly what i am writing up next but simply as an idea. it is disconcerting to me that our minds are thinking the same thing on this... thanks by the way!
Maybe maybe mRNA can sometimes enter the nucleus, but only the nucleus of the small number of deltoid cells in your upper arm. You know the ones that CDC told us the injected material stays localised in.
Root cause of COVID-19? Biotechnology's dirty secret: Contamination. Bioinformatics evidence demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a laboratory, unlikely to be a bioweapon but most likely a result of sloppy experiments
I have been following your work with interest for a while now but I have no medical qualifications at all and my knowledge of biology is limited to Ed Exell A level stuff. But I did a bit of human biology as well and after this shit happened I found myself revising my old textbooks in an effort to understand at least a bit about what others were saying, the people who had not been censored. More recently,as a 63 year old male I was frankly horrified at the reported post menopausal bleeding in a woman of advanced years. I think this made me acutely aware of how critically important the work you are doing now really is, please do not stop! All the best.
Oct 2, 2022·edited Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose
They needed a relatively mild but novel virus that they had a known treatment (e.g., Ivermectin, Hydrochloquine) for because they couldn't take a chance on something getting too far away from them, mutation-wise, that they couldn't control. The original virus and the many mutations they've released since then were merely the justification and the public motivator for the much more controllable poison pen.
Jessica, thank you for doing what you do. Your substack has been one of my touchstones for some time now, shining a light on this very dark place.
Now i know that anecdotals are not scientific, but the idea that this is manmade resonates with me, especially since spring this year, when i went down with something i presume was Covid (+ve LFT, for what it’s worth).
While the bout lasted only some few days and was ‘knocked out of the park’ with NAC, vitamins, plus what I’d usually take for any lurgy, the onset of said disease was noticeably different to anything I’ve ever experienced.
Initially like something was squeezing or attacking my liver, and then other organs. Very intense. Followed by headache, disorientation, blurred vision, aches in every joint, shivering tremors. Somewhere between seafood anaphylaxis and being microwaved. All happening simultaneously.
Not natural. Weirdly, no cough, no shortness of breath at any point - though the panic of the initial onset did make me gasp and my heart pound momentarily.
The following days were just like any other heady lurgy, and then i recovered quite quickly. But the actual onset was something else entirely.
For what it’s worth, i have yet to take the globalists’ needle, and have no intentions of doing so... so, hopefully now my natural immunity is now up to speed, as per pre-2020 science.
Always had a sneaky suspicion it was a laboratory recipe, and your work - along with Arkmedic and others - seems to be confirming this. Thank you again.
Dr. Rose, I'd like to post a free PDF to my web site where I reach over 500 collegiate and research institutions in over 140 countries. Harvard, Cornell, Oxford, Yale, Princeton, EPA, NASA and recently Litigation Consultants access my site. I generate over 240 online page-reads per day, over 30 downloads per day and my most frequent visitors are Department Heads, University Professors, Emeritus, Alumnus, Grad and Undergrads. For example Harvard has visited my site 12 times this year, Yale 14 times, etc. Here's an unfinished manuscript at my Google Drive Account so that you can see what I'm doing. It has not yet been proofed. I would also upload it to Amazon where some of my books exist and are accessible in the EU and 6 additional countries, likely in Never-Never-Land now although I do receive small payments monthly which I would be more than happy to donate to the org.of your choice. Take a look and let me know. jprager@rocketmail.com
I appreciate the gesture but to be honest it makes feel a bit uncomfortable. As much as I can be, I want to be in control of how my writing is contextualized. But thank you!
"...SARS-nCoV-2 spike protein, has actually been shown to be a component part in a motif that assists in the translocation of the spike protein and SARS-CoV-2 S mRNA, to the nucleus of infected cells. ..."
So is this saying that both the bio-weapon released on us & the death jab are capable of getting that spike protein into the nucleus of infected cells?
It seems that the articles I read always start with SARS-nCoV-2 then lead into the mRNA(in the jab) later on. But what about us who will never take the death jab? What is the outcome from the bioweapons released on society? Do we still get AIDs from the lab released bioweapon(not talking about the vax)?
Answer 1 -- yes, it was very likely man made.
Answer 2 -- this paper and many others were hidden because fauch, gates and China want everything censored.
Making contagious viruses is a bad thing, but this one wasn't very good. It harmed the unhealthy and those with corrupt or stupid doctors. Competent immune systems handle it well. Competent doctors handle it well after a short learning curve. The greatest damage was done by the medical industry and the political and media sycophants who support them.
Excellent comment.
#TrudeaumustgoNOW 🆘️
Trudeau is threatening to reimpose the suspended mandates unless more people get more jabs!
#fucktrudeau
I would only take issue with your comment that healthy people “handle it” well.
If what this paper says is true, then the (artificial) spike protein can incorporate into the host DNA. I don’t think this is necessarily only for the vaccine S protein. If the S protein for the original strain that “escaped” from Wuhan (which was engineered in Canada?!?) has these same inserts, then it might be that natural infection may help incorporate artificial S protein into our DNA. Of course, this happens in nature all the time. But in this case, WHY would they design it like that? What other RNA segments are hidden in the Wuhan strain that are designed for nefarious reasons?
As an aside. I remember early on in the pandemic, way before the vaccine came out, that there was a suspicion that the Chinese stole some biological material or data from a CANADIAN high level bio lab. Does anyone remember that story?
We were discussing the virus, not the vax. I haven't seen anything conclusive, but the damage seems to be dose dependent. Virus infection in healthy people is cleared quickly, quicker in some than in others. Relatively few spikes, and those aren't cleaved from the cells, but are eliminated by the immune system. The vax seems to hide better than the virus, and keeps producing spikes much longer, allowing them to accumulate in tissues with toxic effects. We've only begun to identify the long term effects of the vax or the virus. Vax analysis is forbidden, so that will take longer.
It was a lab in Winnipeg if I recall. I believe a bio lab in Australia was also cooperating with the research.
Yes, I recall reading about Baric In NC being prohibited in the US for that type of research. So it went to Canada where it was stolen by Chinese spies. Since Gain of Function was in China, wonder the relationship with the theft?
You are not right, David at the state "Competent immune system handle it well." Competent doctors - please make a clarification since then all the MDs in this country passed re-examination on Covid-19.
People liking this comment, because it is a new form of "believes" formed on the opposite side of social division. Reality is worse and much complex.
Most people were infected, and most of them were unaffected or mildly affected. Their immune systems worked as advertised. A very few got seriously ill. Their immune systems didn't work well. That has been proven by numerous surveys showing a lot more people with antibodies than were reported as infected. Our immune systems have kept us healthy for thousands of years. It's only recently we've purposely defeated it with poor diet and hedonism.
Doctors knew with near absolute certainty in early 2020 that cheap, effective therapies were easily available, but most doctors refused to prescribe them and most pharmacies refused to sell them. That caused one of the greatest mass murders in history. The new form of faith is believing what fauch, or medical bureaucrats, or even clinicians tell us. Successful people learn to supervise their medical employees, not worship them.
Sorry, David, I'm not interested in your arguments. Peace.
Ignorance is bliss.
Whoah - https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
Immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike protein and nucleocapsid) revealed that the lesions with necrotizing encephalitis as well as the acute inflammatory changes in the small blood vessels (brain and heart) were associated with abundant de- posits of the spike protein SARS-CoV-2 subunit 1. Since the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 was consistently absent, it must be assumed that the presence of spike pro- tein in affected tissues was not due to an infection with SARS-CoV-2 but rather to the transfection of the tissues by the gene-based COVID-19-vaccines. Importantly, spike protein could be only demonstrated in the areas with acute inflammatory reactions (brain, heart, and small blood vessels), in particular in endothelial cells, microglia, and astrocytes. This is strongly suggestive that the spike protein may have played at least a contributing role to the development of the lesions and the course of the disease in this patient.
This is a great write-up Jess. Love your PyMols too!
Here's another piece of the puzzle by the way...
If you were going to create a bioweapon and discovered that is was actually piss-poor what you would need to do is make sure that it had GP120 peptides in available locations that were known to be required for antibody-dependent enhancement and which were tolerant of lab manipulation so that they could be inserted into your bioweapon. If your bioweapon flopped then all you would need to do is get your whole population injected with a therapy that produces buckets of antibodies to those peptides so that you could increase infectivity.
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC135957/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25911103/
oh dear. this is exactly what i am writing up next but simply as an idea. it is disconcerting to me that our minds are thinking the same thing on this... thanks by the way!
Synchronicity!
Humans are mathematically impossible if you posit evolution by survival of purely random chance mutations, but here we are!
But CDC told me that mRNA cannot enter the nucleus. Surely they would not spread misinformation.
ROFL emoji needed here... roll on floor 😝
More like a ROFLOLPIMP emoji.
Maybe maybe mRNA can sometimes enter the nucleus, but only the nucleus of the small number of deltoid cells in your upper arm. You know the ones that CDC told us the injected material stays localised in.
Adding to Pradhan et al.:
Root cause of COVID-19? Biotechnology's dirty secret: Contamination. Bioinformatics evidence demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a laboratory, unlikely to be a bioweapon but most likely a result of sloppy experiments
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3766462
If it can be explained by human stupidity why invoke human intelligence?
I wrote about relevance of this paper in my memo:
https://hisha2020.substack.com/p/how-the-2020-pandemic-was-manufactured?r=15gwde&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I have been following your work with interest for a while now but I have no medical qualifications at all and my knowledge of biology is limited to Ed Exell A level stuff. But I did a bit of human biology as well and after this shit happened I found myself revising my old textbooks in an effort to understand at least a bit about what others were saying, the people who had not been censored. More recently,as a 63 year old male I was frankly horrified at the reported post menopausal bleeding in a woman of advanced years. I think this made me acutely aware of how critically important the work you are doing now really is, please do not stop! All the best.
Errata I meant the people who had been censored, I must be tired...
Have you seen this paper from 2021? It might be relevant.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/
Yes!
Those 2 burning questions are white hot.
Well done presentment.
Thank you.
Dr.Malone mentioned that Retraction Watch has found a covert peer review ring https://retractionwatch.com/2022/09/28/exclusive-hindawi-and-wiley-to-retract-over-500-papers-linked-to-peer-review-rings/
They needed a relatively mild but novel virus that they had a known treatment (e.g., Ivermectin, Hydrochloquine) for because they couldn't take a chance on something getting too far away from them, mutation-wise, that they couldn't control. The original virus and the many mutations they've released since then were merely the justification and the public motivator for the much more controllable poison pen.
0ne again way above my paygrade, but keep them coming!
i wish i could get paid to read these!
Jessica, thank you for doing what you do. Your substack has been one of my touchstones for some time now, shining a light on this very dark place.
Now i know that anecdotals are not scientific, but the idea that this is manmade resonates with me, especially since spring this year, when i went down with something i presume was Covid (+ve LFT, for what it’s worth).
While the bout lasted only some few days and was ‘knocked out of the park’ with NAC, vitamins, plus what I’d usually take for any lurgy, the onset of said disease was noticeably different to anything I’ve ever experienced.
Initially like something was squeezing or attacking my liver, and then other organs. Very intense. Followed by headache, disorientation, blurred vision, aches in every joint, shivering tremors. Somewhere between seafood anaphylaxis and being microwaved. All happening simultaneously.
Not natural. Weirdly, no cough, no shortness of breath at any point - though the panic of the initial onset did make me gasp and my heart pound momentarily.
The following days were just like any other heady lurgy, and then i recovered quite quickly. But the actual onset was something else entirely.
For what it’s worth, i have yet to take the globalists’ needle, and have no intentions of doing so... so, hopefully now my natural immunity is now up to speed, as per pre-2020 science.
Always had a sneaky suspicion it was a laboratory recipe, and your work - along with Arkmedic and others - seems to be confirming this. Thank you again.
El Gato had a good article about that sort of vices in the academy...
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/why-public-health-experts-never-want
Dr. Rose, I'd like to post a free PDF to my web site where I reach over 500 collegiate and research institutions in over 140 countries. Harvard, Cornell, Oxford, Yale, Princeton, EPA, NASA and recently Litigation Consultants access my site. I generate over 240 online page-reads per day, over 30 downloads per day and my most frequent visitors are Department Heads, University Professors, Emeritus, Alumnus, Grad and Undergrads. For example Harvard has visited my site 12 times this year, Yale 14 times, etc. Here's an unfinished manuscript at my Google Drive Account so that you can see what I'm doing. It has not yet been proofed. I would also upload it to Amazon where some of my books exist and are accessible in the EU and 6 additional countries, likely in Never-Never-Land now although I do receive small payments monthly which I would be more than happy to donate to the org.of your choice. Take a look and let me know. jprager@rocketmail.com
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WQmbl115hJQ8Uce_AOT-LMK53nd843Mv/view?usp=sharing
I appreciate the gesture but to be honest it makes feel a bit uncomfortable. As much as I can be, I want to be in control of how my writing is contextualized. But thank you!
It just reflects the state of society. Sad.
I'll develop close to 100 pages with your permission.
Great job, Jeff, I've seen the pdf.
spammer or fanboy, either way it adds no value to jessica's work. diverts search engine hits to their own site. advertisers are parasites, imo.
"...SARS-nCoV-2 spike protein, has actually been shown to be a component part in a motif that assists in the translocation of the spike protein and SARS-CoV-2 S mRNA, to the nucleus of infected cells. ..."
So is this saying that both the bio-weapon released on us & the death jab are capable of getting that spike protein into the nucleus of infected cells?
It seems that the articles I read always start with SARS-nCoV-2 then lead into the mRNA(in the jab) later on. But what about us who will never take the death jab? What is the outcome from the bioweapons released on society? Do we still get AIDs from the lab released bioweapon(not talking about the vax)?
i don't know yet...
I know you're very busy, so the response is much appreciated ma'am.