75 Comments
Oct 1, 2022·edited Oct 1, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Answer 1 -- yes, it was very likely man made.

Answer 2 -- this paper and many others were hidden because fauch, gates and China want everything censored.

Making contagious viruses is a bad thing, but this one wasn't very good. It harmed the unhealthy and those with corrupt or stupid doctors. Competent immune systems handle it well. Competent doctors handle it well after a short learning curve. The greatest damage was done by the medical industry and the political and media sycophants who support them.

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

This is a great write-up Jess. Love your PyMols too!

Here's another piece of the puzzle by the way...

If you were going to create a bioweapon and discovered that is was actually piss-poor what you would need to do is make sure that it had GP120 peptides in available locations that were known to be required for antibody-dependent enhancement and which were tolerant of lab manipulation so that they could be inserted into your bioweapon. If your bioweapon flopped then all you would need to do is get your whole population injected with a therapy that produces buckets of antibodies to those peptides so that you could increase infectivity.

How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC135957/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25911103/

Expand full comment

But CDC told me that mRNA cannot enter the nucleus. Surely they would not spread misinformation.

Expand full comment

Adding to Pradhan et al.:

Root cause of COVID-19? Biotechnology's dirty secret: Contamination. Bioinformatics evidence demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a laboratory, unlikely to be a bioweapon but most likely a result of sloppy experiments

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3766462

If it can be explained by human stupidity why invoke human intelligence?

Expand full comment
Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

I have been following your work with interest for a while now but I have no medical qualifications at all and my knowledge of biology is limited to Ed Exell A level stuff. But I did a bit of human biology as well and after this shit happened I found myself revising my old textbooks in an effort to understand at least a bit about what others were saying, the people who had not been censored. More recently,as a 63 year old male I was frankly horrified at the reported post menopausal bleeding in a woman of advanced years. I think this made me acutely aware of how critically important the work you are doing now really is, please do not stop! All the best.

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022·edited Oct 1, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Have you seen this paper from 2021? It might be relevant.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/

Expand full comment
Oct 1, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Yes!

Those 2 burning questions are white hot.

Well done presentment.

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Dr.Malone mentioned that Retraction Watch has found a covert peer review ring https://retractionwatch.com/2022/09/28/exclusive-hindawi-and-wiley-to-retract-over-500-papers-linked-to-peer-review-rings/

Expand full comment
Oct 2, 2022·edited Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

They needed a relatively mild but novel virus that they had a known treatment (e.g., Ivermectin, Hydrochloquine) for because they couldn't take a chance on something getting too far away from them, mutation-wise, that they couldn't control. The original virus and the many mutations they've released since then were merely the justification and the public motivator for the much more controllable poison pen.

Expand full comment

0ne again way above my paygrade, but keep them coming!

Expand full comment
Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Jessica, thank you for doing what you do. Your substack has been one of my touchstones for some time now, shining a light on this very dark place.

Now i know that anecdotals are not scientific, but the idea that this is manmade resonates with me, especially since spring this year, when i went down with something i presume was Covid (+ve LFT, for what it’s worth).

While the bout lasted only some few days and was ‘knocked out of the park’ with NAC, vitamins, plus what I’d usually take for any lurgy, the onset of said disease was noticeably different to anything I’ve ever experienced.

Initially like something was squeezing or attacking my liver, and then other organs. Very intense. Followed by headache, disorientation, blurred vision, aches in every joint, shivering tremors. Somewhere between seafood anaphylaxis and being microwaved. All happening simultaneously.

Not natural. Weirdly, no cough, no shortness of breath at any point - though the panic of the initial onset did make me gasp and my heart pound momentarily.

The following days were just like any other heady lurgy, and then i recovered quite quickly. But the actual onset was something else entirely.

For what it’s worth, i have yet to take the globalists’ needle, and have no intentions of doing so... so, hopefully now my natural immunity is now up to speed, as per pre-2020 science.

Always had a sneaky suspicion it was a laboratory recipe, and your work - along with Arkmedic and others - seems to be confirming this. Thank you again.

Expand full comment
Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

El Gato had a good article about that sort of vices in the academy...

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/why-public-health-experts-never-want

Expand full comment

Dr. Rose, I'd like to post a free PDF to my web site where I reach over 500 collegiate and research institutions in over 140 countries. Harvard, Cornell, Oxford, Yale, Princeton, EPA, NASA and recently Litigation Consultants access my site. I generate over 240 online page-reads per day, over 30 downloads per day and my most frequent visitors are Department Heads, University Professors, Emeritus, Alumnus, Grad and Undergrads. For example Harvard has visited my site 12 times this year, Yale 14 times, etc. Here's an unfinished manuscript at my Google Drive Account so that you can see what I'm doing. It has not yet been proofed. I would also upload it to Amazon where some of my books exist and are accessible in the EU and 6 additional countries, likely in Never-Never-Land now although I do receive small payments monthly which I would be more than happy to donate to the org.of your choice. Take a look and let me know. jprager@rocketmail.com

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WQmbl115hJQ8Uce_AOT-LMK53nd843Mv/view?usp=sharing

Expand full comment
Oct 2, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

"...SARS-nCoV-2 spike protein, has actually been shown to be a component part in a motif that assists in the translocation of the spike protein and SARS-CoV-2 S mRNA, to the nucleus of infected cells. ..."

So is this saying that both the bio-weapon released on us & the death jab are capable of getting that spike protein into the nucleus of infected cells?

It seems that the articles I read always start with SARS-nCoV-2 then lead into the mRNA(in the jab) later on. But what about us who will never take the death jab? What is the outcome from the bioweapons released on society? Do we still get AIDs from the lab released bioweapon(not talking about the vax)?

Expand full comment