Conflicts of interest, lies and requests for truth pertaining to the 'COVID discovery team'
Conduct of further oversight of SARS-CoV-2 origins (not COVID origins)
This document was sent to me via email by Richard Gale. He gave me permission to share it. It looks like a FOIA request looking into the CIA’s decision-making process in ‘determining’ the SARS-CoV-2 zoonotic pathogen idea. It’s probably a good idea to look into that, especially if a bunch of people want to come forward to tell their side of the story of those behind closed doors meetings.
Something I do find odd though, and maybe I am just being nit-picky, is that the letter writers refer repeatedly (and exclusively) to the pathogen called ‘SARS-CoV-2’ as ‘COVID-19’. It seems to me a noteworthy oversight.
I have to wonder how trustworthy results from a FOIA request to the CIA would be. Maybe it’s just my cynical nature but seems like the CIA would be able to figure a way around those. I am completely uneducated on these things though so don’t mind me.
I do find it frustrating when Wenstrup, Turner, and others refer to the origin of Covid-19, not the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and, as a journalist, I need to quote their letters, etc. as they are written. I do, whenever possible, refer to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 rather than the origin of Covid-19, but even the legislation I write about in this and other articles is called the 2023 COVID-19 Origin Act. This is my article about this latest development: https://changingtimes.media/2023/09/13/us-congressmen-say-cia-analysts-were-given-a-significant-monetary-incentive-to-change-their-position-on-the-origin-of-covid-19/