Conflicts of interest, lies and requests for truth pertaining to the 'COVID discovery team'
jessica5b3.substack.com
Conflicts of interest, lies and requests for truth pertaining to the 'COVID discovery team'
Conduct of further oversight of SARS-CoV-2 origins (not COVID origins)
This document was sent to me via email by Richard Gale. He gave me permission to share it. It looks like a FOIA request looking into the CIA’s decision-making process in ‘determining’ the SARS-CoV-2 zoonotic pathogen idea. It’s probably a good idea to look into that, especially if a bunch of people want to come forward to tell their side of the story of those behind closed doors meetings.
Something I do find odd though, and maybe I am just being nit-picky, is that the letter writers refer repeatedly (and exclusively) to the pathogen called ‘SARS-CoV-2’ as ‘COVID-19’. It seems to me a noteworthy oversight.
I have to wonder how trustworthy results from a FOIA request to the CIA would be. Maybe it’s just my cynical nature but seems like the CIA would be able to figure a way around those. I am completely uneducated on these things though so don’t mind me.
I do find it frustrating when Wenstrup, Turner, and others refer to the origin of Covid-19, not the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and, as a journalist, I need to quote their letters, etc. as they are written. I do, whenever possible, refer to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 rather than the origin of Covid-19, but even the legislation I write about in this and other articles is called the 2023 COVID-19 Origin Act. This is my article about this latest development: https://changingtimes.media/2023/09/13/us-congressmen-say-cia-analysts-were-given-a-significant-monetary-incentive-to-change-their-position-on-the-origin-of-covid-19/