An update on the potential dangers of breastfeeding following injection with COVID-19 injectable products
Inspired by a recently published Research Letter in JAMA pediatrics
If you want to read the latest Research Letter on the subject of breast-feeding in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products, please read the article entitled: “Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk” published September 26, 2022.1 If you want an excellent summary of this article, head to Bryam Bridle’s Substack here.
I had written a Substack article on this ages ago (August 14, 2021) but I wanted to update the VAERS report in light of the above.
Here’s some of what I wrote:
Group 3: Breast-feeding women
To date (July 2, 2021), there are 177 AE reports in the VAERS database for breast-feeding women. Three of these reports were filed in the case where infants under 1 year of age had maternal exposure of COVID-19 by-products from the mother. These were reported by the mother and follow-up of infants are not known. They are omitted from the analysis here on in. 16% of the AEs are considered Severe Adverse Events. This is, again, higher than the standard according to the VAERS handbook. Figure 3 shows the distribution by age of AEs reported for pregnant women with the total number of AEs on the left and the SAEs on the right.
Figure 3: Histograms showing distribution of adverse events reported in the VAERS database for breast-feeding women for all reports (left) and for SAE reports (right).
Of these women, 5 (2.8%) have died, 11 (6.2%) have been hospitalized and 13 (7.3%) were taken an emergency room doctor for care. Of the AEs, there are 29 classified as cardiovascular, 47 as neurological and 47 as immunological. There is currently 1 breakthrough COVID-19 case.
Figure 3 left reveals a symmetric, unimodal distribution of all AEs and on the right in Figure 3 is the SAE data (28 data points in total; only 18 data points with AGE) and its ‘distribution’ appears bimodal but there is not sufficient data accrued to make any relevant observations due to lack of information in the AGE field in the VAERS database.
So we had 177 adverse event reports in the VAERS database for breast-feeding women as of August 14, 2021. The current total number is 3,139. With an underreporting factor of 31, this makes the rate of occurrence in 0-4 year olds 1/293.
Here are some details on Severe Adverse Events associated with breast feeding reports in VAERS. 14 of these individuals died. We only have age data on 5 mothers and 1 baby, so we only know that individuals in the context of breast-feeding died: we don’t know if they were the mothers or the infants. 262 of these individuals ended up in the hospital or the ER: 22 of which were under 4 years of age. 213 of these individuals were disabled by these shots, 4 of which were infants 0-4. We are missing age data on almost half of the disabled reports.
Here are the conclusions from the original article that I wrote:
Breast-feeding mothers, infants and pregnant women were in the exclusion criteria list for the phase III clinical trials of both Pfizer and Moderna. Therefore, there is no way to predict the effects on individuals in these contexts. Safety cannot be claimed for this reason and also based on the fact that the SAE reports in the VAERS database are atypically high for the groups examined.
The mRNA products ARE experimental: mRNA platforms are new in medical microbiology and have never before been implemented for use in human subjects on a global scale in the context of viruses. This is not refutable. Since it was not possible to perform a study on the effects of a full-term pregnancy in the timeframe lapsed for the clinical trials to have been deemed respectable and to subsequently issue EUAs for these products, it is not possible now to draw conclusions as to the effects on pregnant women or their infants who are breast-feeding.
The most effective way I can think of to answer questions pertaining to safety and efficacy in these contexts is to inject these products into pregnant women and collect the subsequent data of the effects.
And that’s exactly what they did, isn’t it?
I just couldn’t have written it better. So I will leave it at that.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2796427
"Vaccine shedding isn't real, you idiot."
"That's not how any of this works."
"Shedding is a far-right conspiracy theory."
"Okay, so vaccine mRNA is in birthing people's breast milk...why would that be bad?"
I have a good friend who is breastfeeding her 2 year old. She’s already had three doses -- she did it to keep her job.
This is so awful. I want to share this information with her, but I know it will break her heart.
This is so wrong, almost unbearable.