I am going to find the time to respond to this today. I even emailed this to a list of 40 colleagues from my graduating SLP UofT class of 2010. I haven’t talked to some of them in years but I know they are all mama bears like me. Let’s pray enough people act on this!
The CCCA has been one of the most consistently strong and on point organizations during the Plandemonium. People looking for good information should keep them on the short list of quality sources.
I do not live in Canada and this new trend in allowing effectively unlicensed substances is not unique to Canada since the pharmaceutical companies are global, but the general public are not really aware
at all that these novel products will really be tested on them. It is important therefore to encourage people to carefully consider what is being prescribed to them by anyone and to do their own research before taking any injections that have no long term safety record, and to ask searching questions of their doctors in relation to ay prescribed drug, especially if taken for lengthy periods of time.
If only! I lived during JFK times. The corruption and the corrupt actors will never allow anyone to change the path they have created. Only God can do this.
I submitted my thoughts on this last week to these people. I have to wonder if any of these petitions or letters we write even make a speckle of difference. Nonetheless, we have to try. If they don't hear from people they will think all is well in fairyland.
Ok done, only took about 15 mins after I found the links and templates at the bottom of the Bright Light News article. I commented on the Canada Gazette website, sent and email to Bruno Rodriguez and John Brassard, my MPP in Barrie, Ontario.
Thank you. Dr. Susan provided a great set of comments and useful links. Comment online, to the director and my MP, done, done and done.
I don't trust them to do the right and effective thing for health and safety. After a riding conference call with my MP last month featuring the Canadian Minister of Health -- I submitted some practical, regulatory and other questions, but heard nothing back. I asked questions in our prior election, and heard nothing back since then either. I wrote to my MP again.
The Canadian Minister of Health is all about money, protecting the system and putting people in place as disposable Cogs in the Canadian wheel of financial and authoritarian expediency. The scope of his compassion involved his niece who trained as a nurse, but couldn't take shift work.
For people suffering adverse effects from vaccines, the Minister of Health and our MPs conflate Covid injections with SarsCov2 infection. Of course.
In response to citizens on the call sharing tales of suffering, the Minister translated his feeling into questions about how the provinces use money transferred to them by the Feds. They can't articulate how they are side-step responsibility to divert blame, and gather political power by passing out money to built a system that doesn't work.
So the public assumes we can hold Provincial agencies responsible for quality of care. Not so. There, authority over vaccine mandates were passed out of health agencies hands into corporate, business and institutional offices. That is despite them having no capacity to inform health policies according to reasonable or reliable data. That information is with/held by provincial and federal authorities,
There are court cases against our government by doctors and patients, news of which are being silenced and quashed by government-sponsored and commercial media. No wonder. The RNA/LNP technology was -- of Canadian origin or not -- licensed or sold to, and contracted out by US military-intelligence interests (per discoveries in and FOIA after Brook Jackson's court case against Pfizer). The technology is 30-years old and proven neither safe nor effective.
I wrote in a question to my MP for the Minister of Health, wondering if they took pride in their management of the Pandemic, then let us know how much in the way of licensing payback did the the Canadian Department of Industry and Trade earn on its patents or vax tech investments? For a bonus question on Canadian pride for doing the right thing, could they let us know the numbers showing safety and efficacy of jabs?
There are no numbers for public consumption on the Emergency Use authorization of products licensed from the commercial chain of supply, under the global top-down US military system!
The Emergency Use pandemic is a test model of Agile Licensing. It failed BECAUSE there is no feedback or use of data on the pre-/post- perceptions, processes and effects of licensing. Everyone is in the dark because it's been a secret US/Israeli military operation. Perhaps our dearest Jessica knows all that better than the public, and can't say.
Indeed, Agile licensing questions and, I dare say, Scoping Reviews on technology harms, are not quite a solution to theoretical questions and practical problems. We're missing cross-party civilian involvement in regulatory oversight and hearings geared to dismantling the layers of mandates. Everyone is presumed a knowing, informed or more often unwitting agent of the military operation under which the virus and the counter-measures fall. Gain of Function bioweaponry.
See no evil, hear no evil is used so that evil doers maintain plausible deniability.
Until something changes, Canadians and we all stand up to see the horrific truth, we are rendered a leading lab animal population in the Northern Hemisphere. We are still dying to know better health and receive meaningful care.
Moreover, Jessica: Can I draft a paper built on your Scoping Review to consider how WE AND KNOWN ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ARE A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE RNA/BIOWEAPON PLATFORM?
Without people suffering and dying, the lucrative military-pharma business is nothing.
This is a very complex issue. Clinical trials are designed to have multiple phases, the first being for safety. This is the phase where even more rigor should be applied.
Later phases looking at efficacy while also collecting data on safety often rely on surrogate markers because trials would be too long or need to be very large and therefore expensive to detect survival or other endpoints in diseases where patients may live for a decade or more. This results in many therapies being approved that appear to slow progression but end up having no impact on survival and don’t improve quality of life.
Drugs or therapies that are safe and make a meaningful therapeutic difference can take a decade or more for endpoints to be met! Most companies developing these more effective therapies cannot afford such lengthy trials, so we end up with drugs that nibble around the edges of symptoms and vert few if any cures.
There is a very good middle ground that protects safety and spurs the development of therapies that are effective.
Allowing real world data for historical controls in diseases where there are no known effective treatments and/or the disease has a high mortality and morbidity profile, would protect people who would like to participate in a clinical trial but do not want to be given the placebo. There is a lot of real world data on outcomes and this would reduce the high cost as well as encourage patients to participate in trials, speeding up the process and getting good therapies to market more quickly. This can only work well for patients if the safety phases are rigorous.
The system is inherently beset by a conundrum that the more effective the therapy is, the longer the trial will take and the more expensive it will be. That is why companies take shortcuts and use surrogate markers, but the surrogate markers are not always predictive of better outcomes.
Claire, I've read time and again that because of patent law many proposed new drugs are just rehashes of existing drugs to protect profits with only about 15% being new.
Also, pHarma puts stuff out KNOWING in advance from earliest trials that there are problems, just like pShizer, Murderna with covid jabs and Vioxx, and in the case of Oxy they knew EXACTLY what they were doing. It's ALL about the profit!
And now new covid jabs don't require human tests at all: what could possibly go wrong...
I agree which is why Phase 1 trials should be emphasized and be more rigorous. But for example, some of the new personalized brain cancer immune therapies using the patients own dendritic cells are safe and so effective that it is taking more than 10 years for 50% of the patients to event (die) which means that so many people who would benefit cannot access these therapies. If safety was demonstrated, then data for those surviving beyond the current standard of care could be used to support approval. The current system almost encourages the development of drugs with shorter survival odds because the trials do not have to be run for such a long duration.
Can't disagree with that common sense approach to wider 'trials' where the alternative is early death. Give the patient the option to decide.
Would also like to see movement towards alternatives which are proven to work but suppressed by every possible means by vested interests and the establishment.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if medicine was first and foremost about treating the patient the best way possible. What an amazing change that would be.
I am going to find the time to respond to this today. I even emailed this to a list of 40 colleagues from my graduating SLP UofT class of 2010. I haven’t talked to some of them in years but I know they are all mama bears like me. Let’s pray enough people act on this!
Anyone in any doubt that they are trying to kill us?
Follow the money.
It is not just the money, it is deliberate euthanasia to reduce world population as planned by the evil World Economic Forum in Davos.
They just made all meds way cheaper in Australia. They know how toxic this shit is. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/26/two-for-one-prescriptions-for-patients-a-kick-in-the-guts-for-australian-pharmacies-guild-claims
The CCCA has been one of the most consistently strong and on point organizations during the Plandemonium. People looking for good information should keep them on the short list of quality sources.
Hi Mathew,
I've searched. Can you please give us a hint regarding the full name of this association?
All I came up with is the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association in Toronto, Ontario.
Thanks.
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
Thanks Jessica. ❤
I do not live in Canada and this new trend in allowing effectively unlicensed substances is not unique to Canada since the pharmaceutical companies are global, but the general public are not really aware
at all that these novel products will really be tested on them. It is important therefore to encourage people to carefully consider what is being prescribed to them by anyone and to do their own research before taking any injections that have no long term safety record, and to ask searching questions of their doctors in relation to ay prescribed drug, especially if taken for lengthy periods of time.
Don't take any drugs or jabs until Bobby has cleaned up the corruption at the CDC, FDA, WHO, and NIH.
If only! I lived during JFK times. The corruption and the corrupt actors will never allow anyone to change the path they have created. Only God can do this.
With God's help Bobby might save us. It's our last chance to stop the WEF and WHO from taking over the world.
According to Sigmund Freud, God is a projection of the mind's super ego.
Therefore be guided by your sense of what is right and what is wrong.
Love they neighbor.
Never mind God, Tucker Carlson just woke up to the truth about the Democrats in Congress and was just fired by Fox News.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1650299174066216961
Soooo important that we speak up!!!
Tucker Carlson has seen the light. That is why he was fired from Fox News.
I submitted my thoughts on this last week to these people. I have to wonder if any of these petitions or letters we write even make a speckle of difference. Nonetheless, we have to try. If they don't hear from people they will think all is well in fairyland.
Such short notice... only a day left to respond!
Ok done, only took about 15 mins after I found the links and templates at the bottom of the Bright Light News article. I commented on the Canada Gazette website, sent and email to Bruno Rodriguez and John Brassard, my MPP in Barrie, Ontario.
This is beyond sinister.
Thanks for the link.
British Columbia's New Powers to Silence Dissenting Physicians
Recently passed legislation puts involuntary treatment and mandatory compliance into effect
http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v19n20.shtml
Thank you. Dr. Susan provided a great set of comments and useful links. Comment online, to the director and my MP, done, done and done.
I don't trust them to do the right and effective thing for health and safety. After a riding conference call with my MP last month featuring the Canadian Minister of Health -- I submitted some practical, regulatory and other questions, but heard nothing back. I asked questions in our prior election, and heard nothing back since then either. I wrote to my MP again.
The Canadian Minister of Health is all about money, protecting the system and putting people in place as disposable Cogs in the Canadian wheel of financial and authoritarian expediency. The scope of his compassion involved his niece who trained as a nurse, but couldn't take shift work.
For people suffering adverse effects from vaccines, the Minister of Health and our MPs conflate Covid injections with SarsCov2 infection. Of course.
In response to citizens on the call sharing tales of suffering, the Minister translated his feeling into questions about how the provinces use money transferred to them by the Feds. They can't articulate how they are side-step responsibility to divert blame, and gather political power by passing out money to built a system that doesn't work.
So the public assumes we can hold Provincial agencies responsible for quality of care. Not so. There, authority over vaccine mandates were passed out of health agencies hands into corporate, business and institutional offices. That is despite them having no capacity to inform health policies according to reasonable or reliable data. That information is with/held by provincial and federal authorities,
There are court cases against our government by doctors and patients, news of which are being silenced and quashed by government-sponsored and commercial media. No wonder. The RNA/LNP technology was -- of Canadian origin or not -- licensed or sold to, and contracted out by US military-intelligence interests (per discoveries in and FOIA after Brook Jackson's court case against Pfizer). The technology is 30-years old and proven neither safe nor effective.
I wrote in a question to my MP for the Minister of Health, wondering if they took pride in their management of the Pandemic, then let us know how much in the way of licensing payback did the the Canadian Department of Industry and Trade earn on its patents or vax tech investments? For a bonus question on Canadian pride for doing the right thing, could they let us know the numbers showing safety and efficacy of jabs?
There are no numbers for public consumption on the Emergency Use authorization of products licensed from the commercial chain of supply, under the global top-down US military system!
The Emergency Use pandemic is a test model of Agile Licensing. It failed BECAUSE there is no feedback or use of data on the pre-/post- perceptions, processes and effects of licensing. Everyone is in the dark because it's been a secret US/Israeli military operation. Perhaps our dearest Jessica knows all that better than the public, and can't say.
Indeed, Agile licensing questions and, I dare say, Scoping Reviews on technology harms, are not quite a solution to theoretical questions and practical problems. We're missing cross-party civilian involvement in regulatory oversight and hearings geared to dismantling the layers of mandates. Everyone is presumed a knowing, informed or more often unwitting agent of the military operation under which the virus and the counter-measures fall. Gain of Function bioweaponry.
See no evil, hear no evil is used so that evil doers maintain plausible deniability.
Until something changes, Canadians and we all stand up to see the horrific truth, we are rendered a leading lab animal population in the Northern Hemisphere. We are still dying to know better health and receive meaningful care.
Moreover, Jessica: Can I draft a paper built on your Scoping Review to consider how WE AND KNOWN ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ARE A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE RNA/BIOWEAPON PLATFORM?
Without people suffering and dying, the lucrative military-pharma business is nothing.
Be well. Thank you for the links.
Thanks Jessica.
I missed this. All action taken as requested. I follow UK Column News and they have been talking about the same thing over there.
Amen to this!
This is a very complex issue. Clinical trials are designed to have multiple phases, the first being for safety. This is the phase where even more rigor should be applied.
Later phases looking at efficacy while also collecting data on safety often rely on surrogate markers because trials would be too long or need to be very large and therefore expensive to detect survival or other endpoints in diseases where patients may live for a decade or more. This results in many therapies being approved that appear to slow progression but end up having no impact on survival and don’t improve quality of life.
Drugs or therapies that are safe and make a meaningful therapeutic difference can take a decade or more for endpoints to be met! Most companies developing these more effective therapies cannot afford such lengthy trials, so we end up with drugs that nibble around the edges of symptoms and vert few if any cures.
There is a very good middle ground that protects safety and spurs the development of therapies that are effective.
Allowing real world data for historical controls in diseases where there are no known effective treatments and/or the disease has a high mortality and morbidity profile, would protect people who would like to participate in a clinical trial but do not want to be given the placebo. There is a lot of real world data on outcomes and this would reduce the high cost as well as encourage patients to participate in trials, speeding up the process and getting good therapies to market more quickly. This can only work well for patients if the safety phases are rigorous.
The system is inherently beset by a conundrum that the more effective the therapy is, the longer the trial will take and the more expensive it will be. That is why companies take shortcuts and use surrogate markers, but the surrogate markers are not always predictive of better outcomes.
Claire, I've read time and again that because of patent law many proposed new drugs are just rehashes of existing drugs to protect profits with only about 15% being new.
Also, pHarma puts stuff out KNOWING in advance from earliest trials that there are problems, just like pShizer, Murderna with covid jabs and Vioxx, and in the case of Oxy they knew EXACTLY what they were doing. It's ALL about the profit!
And now new covid jabs don't require human tests at all: what could possibly go wrong...
I agree which is why Phase 1 trials should be emphasized and be more rigorous. But for example, some of the new personalized brain cancer immune therapies using the patients own dendritic cells are safe and so effective that it is taking more than 10 years for 50% of the patients to event (die) which means that so many people who would benefit cannot access these therapies. If safety was demonstrated, then data for those surviving beyond the current standard of care could be used to support approval. The current system almost encourages the development of drugs with shorter survival odds because the trials do not have to be run for such a long duration.
Can't disagree with that common sense approach to wider 'trials' where the alternative is early death. Give the patient the option to decide.
Would also like to see movement towards alternatives which are proven to work but suppressed by every possible means by vested interests and the establishment.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if medicine was first and foremost about treating the patient the best way possible. What an amazing change that would be.
Indeed!!!!